in Re John-Baptist Sekumade Sekumade-Osime PLLC.
in Re John-Baptist Sekumade Sekumade-Osime PLLC.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 8, 2012.
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-12-00120-CV
———————————
IN RE JOHN-BAPTIST SEKUMADEAND SEKUMADE-OSIME PLLC, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
By petition for writ of mandamus, relators John-Baptist Sekumade and Sekumade-Osime PLLC complain that the trial judge abused her discretion by ordering them to pay monetary sanction and holding them in contempt. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
Per Curiam
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.
[1] Relator identifies the underlying case as Erik Davis v. The Sekumade Law Firm and John-Baptist Sekumade, Cause No. 2011-16071 in the 295th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Caroline Baker presiding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.