Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2012

Maritza Janeth Bardales v. State

Maritza Janeth Bardales v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 8, 2012

Maritza Janeth Bardales v. State

Opinion

Opinion issued March 8, 2012.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

 

 


NO. 01-12-00041-CR

____________

 


MARITZA JANETH BARDALES, Appellant

 

V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1298231

 

 


MEMORANDUM OPINION


          Appellant, Maritza Janeth Bardales, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of recklessly causing serious bodily injury to a child.[1]  The trial court deferred a finding of guilt and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, placed appellant on community supervision for a period of six years and assessed a fine of $300.  Appellant filed a notice of appeal.  We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id.  The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).  Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal.  See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle.

 

Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).   



[1]              See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.04(a)(1), (e) (West Supp. 2011).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.