in the Interest of M.D., A.D., A.D., R.D., Children

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00904-CV In the INTEREST OF M.D., A.D., A.D., R.D., M.D., Children

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PA-00352

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge Presiding 1 Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 9, 2012 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED

Appellant mother, N.D., appeals the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to M.D., A.D., A.D., R.D., and M.D. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating there are no arguable grounds to be advanced and concluding the appeal is frivolous. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03- 00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure to appeals from orders terminating parental rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). Appellant was provided a copy of the brief and informed of her right to file her own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 23, 1997, no pet.); In re R.R., 2003 WL 21157944, at *4. Appellant did not file a pro se brief.

We have reviewed the record and the attorney’s brief and we agree with counsel that the appellate points do not present a substantial question for appellate review. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 13.003(b) (West 2002); TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(d)(3) (incorporating section 13.003(b) by reference). Accordingly, we hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the points of appeal to be frivolous. We grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Marialyn Barnard, Justice