Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012

Stephen R. Smith v. State

Stephen R. Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided April 18, 2012
Stephen R. Smith v. State

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00149-CR Stephen R. SMITH, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR2918 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 18, 2012 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence on September 2, 2011, and appellant did not file a motion for new trial. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal was therefore October 2, 2011. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A document, which we construe to be appellant’s notice of appeal, was not filed until March 2, 2012. Appellant did not file a timely motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.

On March 9, 2012, we issued an order advising appellant that his notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and advising him to show cause on or before March 29, 2012, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We further advised appellant that if he failed to satisfactorily respond by March 29, 2012, we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant did not file a response.

Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of- time appeals from felony convictions). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM Do No Publish

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.