Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012

ChamPale Adams v. Richard Tauizon

ChamPale Adams v. Richard Tauizon
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided March 14, 2012
ChamPale Adams v. Richard Tauizon

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00574-CV

ChamPale ADAMS,

Appellant v.

Richard TAUIZON,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 9, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 370658

Honorable Walden Shelton, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 14, 2012

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was due on January 30, 2012. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. We, therefore, ordered Appellant ChamPale Adams to file, on or before February 27, 2012, appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) the failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee was not significantly injured by the failure to timely file a brief. We warned that if Appellant ChamPale Adams failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply with a court order). Appellant ChamPale Adams has failed to respond to our order. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant ChamPale Adams.

PER CURIAM

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.