Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

Claude Windell Montgomery v. State

Claude Windell Montgomery v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 11, 2013

Claude Windell Montgomery v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00454-CR

Claude Windell Montgomery, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 426TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 69010, HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appointed counsel for appellant Claude Windell Montgomery has filed a motion to withdraw supported by an Anders brief concluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit.

See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). After the brief was filed, Montgomery filed a pro se motion to dismiss his appeal. We grant Montgomery’s pro se motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).1 Counsel’s motion to withdraw is dismissed as moot.

See also Smith v. State, No. 02-07-00029-CR, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 4696, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 14, 2007, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal under similar circumstances); Crockett v. State, No. 07-04-00438-CR, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 796, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Jan. 31, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (same). __________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: December 11, 2013 Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.