Jasper Canady England v. State
Jasper Canady England v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013
NO. 03-12-00635-CV
Jasper Canady England, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s order is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013
NO. 03-12-00636-CV
Jasper Canady England, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s order is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013
NO. 03-12-00637-CV
Jasper Canady England, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s order is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013
NO. 03-12-00638-CV
Jasper Canady England, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s order is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013
NO. 03-12-00639-CV
Jasper Canady England, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s order is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013
NO. 03-12-00640-CV
Jasper Canady England, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s order is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013
NO. 03-12-00641-CV
Jasper Canady England, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s order is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013
NO. 03-12-00642-CV
Jasper Canady England, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s order is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2013
NO. 03-12-00643-CV
Jasper Canady England, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s order: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s order is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.