Petition Granted and Order filed July 30, 2013.

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-13-00619-CV ____________ ASNAKE T. BELEHU, Appellant V. CAROLYN LAWNICZAK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF DANIEL J. LAWNICZAK DECEASED, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-58115

ORDER On July 17, 2013, Asnake T. Belehu timely filed a petition for a permissive interlocutory appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 28.3, in which he seeks to appeal the trial court’s July 2, 2013, denial of his motion for summary judgment based on immunity or limited liability under the Texas Tort Claims Act (TTCA). See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 101.106(f)), 101.023(b).

To be entitled to a permissive appeal, a party must establish that: (1) “the order to be appealed involves a controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion” and (2) “an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.” Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(e)(4).

More than ten days have passed since the petition was filed, and no response has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(f), (j). After review of the petition, we conclude that appellant has established his entitlement to a permissive appeal, and we GRANT the petition.

The notice of appeal is deemed to be filed on today’s date, and the appeal is considered an accelerated appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k). A separate notice of appeal need not be filed. Id. The appellate filing fees are due immediately. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. The record is due within ten days of today’s date. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b). A copy of this order must be filed with the trial court clerk. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Donovan.