Osei, Michael v. State
Osei, Michael v. State
Opinion
RECEIVED Court of Appeals SEp 232013 Lisa Matz Clerk, 5th District IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-76,669-01, WR-76,669-02 AND WR-76,669-03
EX PARTE MICHAEL ASIBEY OSEI, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. W03-48341-M(A), W03-48342-M(A) AND W03-48343-M(A) IN THE 194TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418S.W.2d 824,826(Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted oftwocharges of aggravated assault of a public servant in the -01 and -02 cases, and one charge of aggravated robbery in the -03 case. Applicant was sentenced to forty years' imprisonment in each of the aggravated assault cases, to be served consecutively with a fifty-year sentence in the aggravated robbery case. Intwo separate opinions, the Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Osei v. State, Nos. 05-04-00389-CR and 05-04-00390-CR (Tex. App. - Dallas, April 22,2005) and Osei v. State, No. 05-03-01428-CR (Tex. App. - Dallas, August 24, 2004).
Applicant contends that his retained PDR counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely file petitions for discretionary review in all three cases. We remandedthis application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The trial court conducted a livehearing on March 7, 2013, at which Applicant, his mother, Applicant's appellate counsel and his retained PDR counsel testified. Based onthe testimony and evidence presented atthehabeas hearing, thetrial court hasentered findings offact and conclusions of law that PDR counsel failed to timely file petitions for discretionary review in all three cases, thereby denying Applicant ameaningful opportunity topetitions this Court for discretionary review.
The trial court recommends that relief be granted.
We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time petitions for discretionary review ofthejudgments oftheFifth Court ofAppeals in Cause Nos. 05-04-00389- CR, 05-04-00390-CR and 05-03-01428-CR that affirmed his convictions in Cause Nos. F03-48341 - M, F03-48342-M and F03-48343 from the 194th District Court of Dallas County. Applicant shall file his petitions for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court's mandate issues.
Delivered: September 18, 2013 Do not publish OFFICIAL BUSINESS STATE OF TEXAS &l s~*% R0-BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION PENALTY FOR g3 3 ^^ky "" ^r ""^d—fri ^ ^ ^ ^ » PITNf V BOWES AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 PRIVATE USE 02 1R $ AH 304 Q-u. 0002000240 SEPT9 2°13 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 78 701 WR-76,669-01, WR-76,669-02 &WR-76,669-03 lTsACMAT2T0FAPPEALSCLE^ SB HQT-S3B 75202 •f'/--//|*».l|/i|If/,tlf#|ff.«.f#.#l.f|/f.fftf//...#t.//f|J.i.f#l
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.