in Re Reginald Stevenson and Diane Stevenson
in Re Reginald Stevenson and Diane Stevenson
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-13-00229-CV _________________
IN RE REGINALD STEVENSON AND DIANE STEVENSON ________________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION After J.B.B.’s father was committed to mental health services and his mother died, J.B.B. was removed by a court order obtained by the Department of Family and Protective Services and subsequently placed with intervening relatives.
J.B.B.’s maternal grandparents petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to vacate its order of May 6, 2013, and grant their motion to strike the intervention filed by the real parties in interest with whom J.B.B. currently resides.
See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 102.003 (West Supp. 2012). After reviewing the petition for writ of mandamus and the response filed by the real parties in interest,
we conclude the relators are not entitled to relief. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 102.004 (West 2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on May 24, 2013 Opinion Delivered June 13, 2013 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.