Patrick Lee Mullins v. the Honorable Mark Holt
Patrick Lee Mullins v. the Honorable Mark Holt
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00114-CV PATRICK LEE MULLINS, Appellant v. THE HONORABLE MARK HOLT, Appellee
From the Justice of the Peace Court Precinct 3 Walker County, Texas
ORDER
Subsequent to the issuance of an opinion on May 9, 2013 in which we dismissed Patrick Lee Mullins’s appeal as frivolous, Mullins presented two motions for filing with the Court: 1. “Appellants Late Motion for Leave to File Affidavit of Indigence so as to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal;” and 2. “Appellant’s First Verified Motion to Suspend Rule 9.5, Tex. R. App. Pro.”
We have processed Mullins’s appeal as if Mullins was pro se as was made quite clear in his initial filings. Further, Mullins’s appeal was processed on the limited number of copies we received.
Accordingly, Mullins’s belated motion for leave to proceed as a pauper is unnecessary; and we dismiss both the motion for leave to file and the motion to waive Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5 as moot.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motions dismissed Order issued and filed May 23, 2013
Mullins v. Holt Page 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.