In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-12-00262-CR _________________ WILLIAM SIDNER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _________________________________________________________________ _ On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 10-04-04064 CR _________________________________________________________________ _ ORDER Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief which urges this Court to review this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408-09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Counsel certified service of the motion to withdraw and the brief on the appellant. Counsel states he provided appellant with a copy of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record, notified appellant of his right

to review the record and file a pro se brief, and advised appellant of his right to seek discretionary review.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that appellant, William Sidner, be given 60 days from the date hereof to file a pro se brief. It is, further, ORDERED that the State may file a reply brief, due 30 days from the date appellant files his brief, or if no brief is filed by appellant, 70 days from the date hereof.

ORDER ENTERED March 21, 2013.

PER CURIAM Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.