in Re John S. Morgan and John S. Morgan, P.C. D/B/A Morgan Law Firm
in Re John S. Morgan and John S. Morgan, P.C. D/B/A Morgan Law Firm
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00095-CV ____________________
IN RE JOHN S. MORGAN AND JOHN S. MORGAN, P.C.
D/B/A MORGAN LAW FIRM
_______________________________________________________ ______________ Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION John S. Morgan and John S. Morgan, P.C. d/b/a Morgan Law Firm filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which they seek to compel the trial court to vacate its venue ruling and permit full venue discovery, to vacate its orders quashing venue discovery and permit relators to depose venue fact witnesses, and to conduct a hearing on relators’ motion to disqualify opposing counsel. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. After reviewing the petition and mandamus record, we conclude that the relators have not shown that the trial court committed a clear abuse of discretion for which the relators lack an adequate
remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered March 14, 2013 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.