Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

Robert Fair, Independent of the Estate of Wilton Fair, and Barton Walker Fair, Jr. v. Arp Club Lake, Inc.

Robert Fair, Independent of the Estate of Wilton Fair, and Barton Walker Fair, Jr. v. Arp Club Lake, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 30, 2013

Robert Fair, Independent of the Estate of Wilton Fair, and Barton Walker Fair, Jr. v. Arp Club Lake, Inc.

Opinion

* 02/12/2013 01:59 FAX 9035951299 THIGPEN & RANEY H002

CAUSE NO. ll-0588-A/B FILED ROBERT FAIR, 1NDFPF.NDHNT EXECUTOR IN TtHr DISTRICT COURT OF THE HSTATF OF WTT.TON FAIR, DECKASED, and BARTON WALKER FAIR, JR. PlainliiTs SM VS. ARP CLUB LAKE, TNC, BOB DEHAAN, JAMES T. & LOIS D. JACOBS, JEANNE DAVIS, ROSE WEST, and JAMES D. & DORIS CARUTHERS Defendants 114TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Order Granting Defendant Arp Club Lake, Lnc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment

On this day came on to be heard Defendant Arp Club Lake, lnc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Court, having considered same is of the opinion that said Motion should be GRANTED.

IT TS THEREFORE ORDERED that all of Plaintiffs ROBERT FAIR, INDEPENDENT fcXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF WILTON FAIR, DECEASED, and BARTON WALKER l'AIR, JR.'s claims against Defendant ARP CLUB LAKH, INC., are hereby dismissed with prejudice to the re-tiling of same.

SIGNED this ♦ 02/12/2013 02:00 FAX 9035951299 THIGPEN & RANEY @]003 ' •** cjjj j<ia r mm ZX}^ Pa9e:l'4 y ,

CAUSE NO. 11-0588-A/B ROBERT FAIR, INDEPENDENT § EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF § WILTON FAIR, DECEASED AND § BARTON WALKER FAIR, JR., § Plaintiffs § § § § ARP CLUB LAKE, INC., BOB DEHAAN § JAMES T. AND LOIS D JACOBS, § JEANNE DAVIS, ROSE WEST AND § JAMES D. AND DORIS CARUTHERS, § Defendants. § 114th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JEANNE DAVIS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT On this day, came on to be considered Defendant Jeanne Davis's Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Court, having considered same is of the opinion that said Motion should be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Joanne Davis's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ail of Plaintiffs Robert Fair, independent Executor of the Estate of Wilton Fair, Deceased, and Barton Walker Fair, Jr.'s claims against Defendant Jeanne Davis are hereby dismissed with prejudice to refiling.

SIGNED this day of , 2013.

JUbCE CHRISTI KENNEDY, Presiding Judge 14th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS 02/12/2013 02:00 FAX 9035951299 THIGPEN & RANEY E1004

CAUSE NO. I1-0588-A/B

ROBERT FAIR, INDEPENDENT § INT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF § L.' WILTON FAIR, DECEASED § AND BARTON WALKER, FAIR, JR § SMTHCO Plaintiffs § VS. §

ARP CLUB LAKE, INC., BOB DEHAAN, § JAMES T. & IX)IS D, JACOBS, JEANNE § DAVIS, ROSE WEST, and JAMES D § & DORIS CARUTHERS § Defendants 8 iTH ] 4U1 JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS, BOB DEHAAJN AND JAMES D. AND DORIS CARUTHERS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On this day came on to be heard Defendant Bob Dehaan and James D. and Doris Caruthers' Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Court, having considered same b of the opinion that said Motion should GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all of Plaintiffs ROBERT PAIR, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF WILTON FAIR, DECEASED, and BARTON WALKER FAIR, /R.'S claims against Defendants BOB DEHANN and JAMES D. AND DORIS CARUTHERS are hereby dismissed with prejudice to the rc-filing of same.

SIGNED thi

3E PRESIDING 02/12/2013 02:00 FAX 9035951299 THIGPEN & RANEY 11005 Pave:

CAUSE NO. U-0588-A/B ROBERT FAIR, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR § THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE ESTATE OF WTLTON FAIR, § DECEASED, and BARTON WALKER FAIR, JR. § Plaintiffs §

I ARP CLUB LAKE, INC., BOB DEHAAN, § JAMES T. & LOIS D. JACOBS, JEANNE DAVIS, ROSE WEST, and JAMES D. & DORIS CARUTHERS § Defendants 114TH JUDICIAL DTSTRTCT

Order Denying Plaintiffs* Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

On this day came on for submission Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and the court, after considering said Motion and Defendant Arp Clnb LaK'e, Fnc.'s Response thereto, is of the opinion that said Motion should he DENIED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs1 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment iis DENIED.

SIGNED this JC/ day of

JUDGE PRESIDING

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.