In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-12-00532-CR NO. 09-12-00533-CR ____________________

WILBUR BRANDON NIXON a/k/a WILBUR NIXON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 11-12114 and 11-13031 __________________________________________________________________ ORDER On January 11, 2013, appellant’s appointed counsel filed motions to withdraw and briefs which urge this Court to review these appeals pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408-09 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Counsel certified service of the motions to withdraw and the briefs on the appellant. Counsel states

that he provided appellant with a copy of the reporter’s records and notified appellant of his right to review the records and file pro se briefs.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that appellant, Wilbur Brandon Nixon a/k/a Wilbur Nixon, be given 60 days from the date hereof to file pro se briefs. It is, further, ORDERED that the State may file reply briefs, due 30 days from the date appellant files his briefs, or if no briefs are filed by appellant, 70 days from the date hereof.

It is further ORDERED that counsel for appellant advise appellant of his right to seek discretionary review under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.

See Tex. R. App. P. 48.4; see also Tex. R. App. P. 68.

ORDER ENTERED February 7, 2013.

PER CURIAM Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.