Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

Juan Mendez v. Citimortgage, Inc. Its Successors and/or Assigns

Juan Mendez v. Citimortgage, Inc. Its Successors and/or Assigns
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 14, 2013

Juan Mendez v. Citimortgage, Inc. Its Successors and/or Assigns

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00428-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ JUAN MENDEZ, APPELLANT, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, APPELLEE. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the County Court of Willacy County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam On June 11, 2013, this appeal was abated and remanded to the trial court for purposes of supplementing the appellate record. This cause is before us because the parties have filed a “Joint Motion of Appellant Juan Mendez and Appellee Citimortgage, Inc. for Dismissal of Appeal.” Accordingly, this appeal is REINSTATED.

According to the joint motion, appellant and appellee have reached an agreement in resolution of their dispute and request the Court dismiss this appeal and set aside the judgment without regard to the merits and without prejudice to appellee’s right to pursue a new forcible detainer proceeding to obtain possession of the property.

The voluntary dismissal of civil appeals is governed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1. Under Rule 42.1(a), an appeal may be dismissed on a motion by the appellant, in which case “the court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless disposition would prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.” See id. R. 42.1(a)(1). In contrast, an appeal may be dismissed by agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk, in which case the court may: (1) render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreements; (2) set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with their agreements; or (3) abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement. See id. R. 42.1(a)(2).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the agreed motion filed by the parties herein, is of the opinion that it should be and is GRANTED. We SET ASIDE the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and REMAND the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties. See id. R. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The joint motion is silent regarding the assessment of costs for the appeal, so the costs will be taxed against appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 14th day of November , 2013.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.