OPINION

Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not following a prior order of this Court. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levarlo, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim.App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim.App. 2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.