Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

in Re: Lillian Blancas, in Her Official Capacity as an Assistant District Attorney for the State of Texas

in Re: Lillian Blancas, in Her Official Capacity as an Assistant District Attorney for the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 27, 2013

in Re: Lillian Blancas, in Her Official Capacity as an Assistant District Attorney for the State of Texas

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ' IN RE: LILLIAN BLANCAS, IN HER No. 08-13-00256-CR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS AN ' ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' IN MANDAMUS Relator. ' ' '

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Relator’s motion to stay the trial court proceedings in The State of Texas v. Roberto Flores, cause no. 2013D03010 pending in the 168th District Court of El Paso County, Texas. Relator Lillian Blancas, in her official capacity as an assistant district attorney, asserts that on Monday, August 26, 2013, the Honorable Judge Marcos Lizarraga sent an email in which the court attached an “Order of Court Setting” related to “Contempt Proceedings: Assistant Attorneys Darnold, Warrick and Blancas” for hearing today, August 27, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. Relator further alleges that Judge Lizarraga provided at today’s hearing a “Notice of July 10 Actions (Selected)” and reset the hearing for tomorrow morning, August 28, 2013, at 8:00 a.m. The trial court has not specified the contemptuous acts, has not indicated the exact purposes of the hearing, and has not provide due notice.

The trial court may not hold “contempt proceedings” against an officer of the court without affording due process rights of reasonable notice, personal service, an opportunity to be heard, and a reasonable time to prepare for their defense. See Taylor v. Haynes, 418 US. 488, 497-500, 98 S.

Ct. 2697, 2703-04, 41 L.Ed.2d 897 (1974); Ex parte Martin, 656 S.W.2d 443, 445 (Tex.Crim.App. 1982).

The trial court has failed to provide reasonable notice of the specific allegations leveled against Relator, has failed to provide personal service, has failed to provide a meaningful opportunity to be heard, and has failed to provide a reasonable amount of time before the hearing to prepare for a defense. Therefore, the motion to stay the proceedings is GRANTED until further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of August, 2013.

PER CURIAM Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ. (Rivera, J., not participating)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.