Juan Gilbert v. State
Juan Gilbert v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § JUAN GILBERT, No. 08-11-00359-CR § Appellant, Appeal from § v. 372nd District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Tarrant County, Texas § Appellee. (TC # 1002470D) §
JUDGMENT The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified below for observance.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013.
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § JUAN GILBERT, No. 08-11-00359-CR § Appellant, Appeal from § v. 372nd District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Tarrant County, Texas § Appellee. (TC # 1002470D) §
RECORD RETENTION STATEMENT: Pursuant to the Supreme Court order regarding disposition of court documents in this case, it is determined that this record should be: x NOT PERMANENTLY PRESERVED (NO HISTORICAL VALUE) PERMANENTLY PRESERVED (PERMANENTLY RETAIN--HAS HISTORICAL VALUE) PERMANENTLY RETAINED CRIMINAL CASE (sentence over 20 years)
_______________________________________________ ____3/28/13____________ Judge=s Signature Date Date Destroyed: ______________________________ per Order dated _____________ COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § JUAN GILBERT, No. 08-11-00359-CR § Appellant, Appeal from § v. 372nd District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Tarrant County, Texas § Appellee. (TC # 1002470D) § ORDER On this the 28th day of March, 2013, came on to be heard Kimberly Campbell’s motion to withdraw. Having determined that counsel has met the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967) and TEX.R.APP.P. 6.5, we grant the motion to withdraw on the following terms and conditions: Counsel is directed to (1) forward to Appellant this order and the Court’=s opinion and judgment issued this same day in this cause; (2) notify Appellant of the availability of discretionary review; and (3) notify Appellant of the appellate deadlines applicable to discretionary review.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013.
________________________________________________ ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.