in Re Fi'Ness Edward Stokes
in Re Fi'Ness Edward Stokes
in Re Fi'Ness Edward Stokes
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00320-CV NO. 02-13-00321-CV
IN RE FI’NESS EDWARD STOKES RELATOR
------------ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ------------ The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and the response of the State and is of the opinion that relief should be denied because relator has an adequate remedy under article 47.01A of the code of criminal procedure. 2 Accordingly, all relief is denied.
PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, MCCOY, and GABRIEL, JJ.
DELIVERED: October 1, 2013
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 47.01A (West 2006).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.