COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00191-CR

RONALD WAYNE MITCHEL APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------- Appellant Ronald Wayne Mitchel appeals his conviction and eight-year sentence for felony DWI. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04(a), 49.09(b)(2) (West Supp. 2012). Mitchel’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel avers that, in her professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

S. Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for appeal. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Mitchel did not file a pro se brief, but he did file a motion—apparently in response to his counsel’s motion to withdraw—requesting that we appoint him another counsel for this appeal.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See Stafford, 813 S.W.2d at 511; Mays, 904 S.W.2d at 922–23. Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, we deny Mitchel’s motion because he has had court-appointed appellate counsel up until this point, and we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BILL MEIER JUSTICE PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: June 13, 2013