Desni C. Kramer v. Darrell D. Bowen and Mary S. Kennedy
Desni C. Kramer v. Darrell D. Bowen and Mary S. Kennedy
Desni C. Kramer v. Darrell D. Bowen and Mary S. Kennedy
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00103-CV
DESNI C. KRAMER APPELLANT V. DARRELL D. BOWEN AND MARY APPELLEES S. KENNEDY
------------ FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ We have considered “Appellant’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal With Prejudice.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: June 13, 2013
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.