in Re Donny Gene Lambert
in Re Donny Gene Lambert
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
|
NO. 02-13-00055-CV
In re donny gene lambert |
| RELATOR |
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
------------
The court has considered relator’s pro se petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that it has no jurisdiction over the relief requested.[2] Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, DAUPHINOT, and GABRIEL, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 21, 2013
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
[2]See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2012); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding); In re Watson, 253 S.W.3d 319, 320 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008, orig. proceeding) (holding that if an applicant finds it necessary to complain about an action or inaction of the convicting court in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding, an applicant may seek mandamus relief from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.