Tamie Miller v. Parks at Sycamore School Apartments
Tamie Miller v. Parks at Sycamore School Apartments
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00282-CV
TAMIE MILLER APPELLANT V. PARKS AT SYCAMORE SCHOOL APPELLEE APARTMENTS
------------ FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ On February 2, 2013, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 7, 2013
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.