COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00363-CV

RUBY LUCILLE HALL APPELLANT V. RDSL ENTERPRISES LLC D/B/A APPELLEES JACK IN THE BOX, AND JACK IN THE BOX, INC.

------------ FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ We have considered “Appellant's Motion To Dismiss All Claims Against Jack In The Box, Inc.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal against Jack in the Box, Inc. only. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). This case shall hereafter be styled Ruby Lucille Hall v. RDSL Enterprises LLC d/b/a Jack in the Box.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, GARDNER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 14, 2013