Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

Terrell Lloyd Sr. A/K/A Terrell Lloyd v. State

Terrell Lloyd Sr. A/K/A Terrell Lloyd v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 10, 2013

Terrell Lloyd Sr. A/K/A Terrell Lloyd v. State

Opinion

02-12-540-CR


COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

 

 

 

NO. 02-12-00540-CR

 

 

Terrell Lloyd Sr. a/k/a Terrell Lloyd

 

 

 

v.

 

 

 

The State of Texas

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

From the 372nd District Court

 

of Tarrant County (1291790D)

 

January 10, 2013

 

Per Curiam

 

(nfp)

 

JUDGMENT

          This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the appeal should be dismissed.  It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

 

 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

 

 

 

PER CURIAM

 

 

 


COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

 

 

 

NO. 02-12-00540-CR

 

 

TERRELL LLOYD SR. A/K/A TERRELL LLOYD

 

APPELLANT

                                                                                                                            

V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS

 

STATE

 

 

------------

 

FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

 

------------

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

 

------------

Appellant Terrell Lloyd Sr. a/k/a Terrell Lloyd attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of unauthorized use of a vehicle and sentencing him to two years’ confinement pursuant to a plea agreement.  The trial court’s certification of his right to appeal states that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

On November 15, 2012, this court notified appellant about the statement on the trial court’s certification and informed him that unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court, on or before November 26, 2012, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, the appeal may be dismissed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3.  We received responses from Appellant on November 20 and November 27, but neither shows grounds for continuing the appeal.  Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

 

                                                                             PER CURIAM

 

 

PANEL:  MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED:  January 10, 2013



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.