Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

Albert Haggerty v. State

Albert Haggerty v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 18, 2013

Albert Haggerty v. State

Opinion

DISMISS; Opinion Filed April 18, 2013.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00463-CR No. 05-13-00467-CR ALBERT HAGGERTY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-00611-P, F08-72422-P MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans Albert Haggerty pleaded guilty to indecency with a child and sexual assault of a child.

Pursuant to plea agreements, the trial court assessed punishment at five years’ imprisonment in each case. Appellant waived his right to appeal in conjunction with the plea agreements. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court certified that appellant does not have the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

/David W. Evans/ DAVID W. EVANS JUSTICE Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47 130463F.U05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ALBERT HAGGERTY, Appellant On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-13-00463-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F12-00611-P. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans, Justices THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Francis and Lang participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 18th day of April, 2013.

/David W. Evans/ DAVID W. EVANS JUSTICE

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ALBERT HAGGERTY, Appellant On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-13-00467-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F08-72422-P. Opinion delivered by Justice Evans, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Lang participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 18th day of April, 2013.

/David W. Evans/ DAVID W. EVANS JUSTICE

130463.op.docx –3–

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.