Reginald W. Spivey v. Trenita Gail Spivey
Reginald W. Spivey v. Trenita Gail Spivey
Opinion
Opinion issued October 22, 2013
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00015-CV ——————————— REGINALD W. SPIVEY, Appellant V. TRENITA GAIL SPIVEY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 312th District Court1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2010-44699
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant attempts to appeal from an order setting entry date/hearing, but such an order is not reviewable by appeal. When a party attempts to appeal a non-
Counsel for Appellant: Ronald G. Ray Counsel for Appellee: Greg Abbott Trial court Judge: Hon. David Farr appealable interlocutory order, the appellate court has no jurisdiction except to dismiss the appeal. See Nikoulouzos v. St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, 162 S.W.3d 678, 681 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.). Ten days’ notice of intent to dismiss was given to all parties in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. No party has responded to the notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.