Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

in the Interest of I. T. S., a Child

in the Interest of I. T. S., a Child
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 15, 2013

in the Interest of I. T. S., a Child

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: In the Interest of I.T.S., aka B.G.H., a Child Appellate case number: 01-13-00566-CV Trial court case number: 2012-01859J Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above-referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967).

Counsel, however, has not filed a motion to withdraw from representation.

If appointed counsel believes that an appeal is frivolous, counsel must request permission to withdraw. See id.; see also In re K.D., 127 S.W.3d 66, 67 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]

2003, no pet.) (holding procedures set forth in Anders apply to appeal from termination of parental rights when counsel concludes that there are no arguable issues to assert on appeal). An Anders brief must accompany a motion to withdraw, neither the brief nor the motion may be filed on its own. See id.; In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406–08 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

Accordingly, we order appellant’s appointed counsel, Donald M. Crane, to file with the Clerk of this Court within 10 days of the date of this order a motion to withdraw that complies with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 6.5 and 9. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5, 9; Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 410, 412.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 15, 2013

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.