Wilson and Janice Jones, and All Occupants v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Wilson and Janice Jones, and All Occupants v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Opinion
DISMISS; Opinion issued March 28, 2013
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00425-CV WILSON AND JANICE JONES AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF N. SILVER CREEK DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellants V. VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT), DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-08796-C MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, FitzGerald, and Myers The Court has before it appellee’s March 1, 2013 motion to dismiss appeal as moot, which is unopposed. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2).
PER CURIAM
120425F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT WILSON AND JANICE JONES, AND ALL On Appeal from the County Court at Law OCCUPANTS OF 610 N. SILVER CREEK No. 3, Dallas County, Texas DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellants Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-08796-C.
Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices No. 05-12-00425-CV V. Bridges, FitzGerald and Myers.
VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT), DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT), DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS recover its costs of this appeal from appellants WILSON AND JANICE JONES, AND ALL OCCUPANTS OF N. SILVER CREEK DALLAS, TEXAS.
Judgment entered March 28, 2013.
/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
–2–
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.