Mark Davis v. Middle Bosque Partners, LP, and Highland Coryell Ranch, LLC
Mark Davis v. Middle Bosque Partners, LP, and Highland Coryell Ranch, LLC
Opinion
Jfourtlj Court of .5 chitonio, Cr.wis' October 3. 2013
No. 04-13-GG464-CV Mark Davis.
Appellant V.
Middle Bosquc Partners, LP, and 1 lighland C'oryell Ranch, LLC, Appellees
Trial Court Case No. D12-21464-CV
ORDER The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and ihc majority of the judges have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. APP. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on November 6.
2013. lo the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Barnard, and Justice Alvarez. All parlies will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with Tl-x. R. API'. P. 48.
party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider ils determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be Hied within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
It is so OUD1CKGD on October 3. 2013.
Catherina Stone, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHERKOh. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal o/the said on this October 3.2013. / S~\ I
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.