Jfotirtlj Court of Appeals' %>i\\\ fintanio, October 3. 2013

No. 04-13-00194-CV

Eusebio Vejil, Appellant

v.

Rosita Vejil, Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 2G12-CI-20I86

ORDER The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and tactual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. App. P. 39.X. Therefore, all requests for oral argument arc denied, and the cause is advanced for ON I1R1KFS submission on November 6, 2013. lo the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Barnard, and Justice Alvarez. All parlies will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. Api\ P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. A!1!1. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the dale of this order.

It is so ORDERED on October 3, 2013.

Catherine Stone. Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this October 3. 2013.

E-ilh H./lottk. Clerk