Mustafa Nadaf D/B/A Discount Mini Mart v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Mustafa Nadaf D/B/A Discount Mini Mart v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Opinion
Jfourtl) Court of $s>n\\ 3ntomo, October 2. 2013
No. 04-13-00068-CV
Mustafa Nadafd/b/a Discount Mini Man, Appellant v.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Gregg Abbott, Attorney General for the Slalc of Texas.
Appellees
Trial Court Case No. D-l-GN09-002367
ORDER The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument arc denied, and the cause is advanced for ON HUIETS submission on November 12.
2013. to the following panel: Justice Marion. Justice Martinez, and Justice Chapa. .All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. App. I1. 48.
Either party may llle a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination thai oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal ami factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. App. I1. 39.S. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
It is so ORDERED on October 2. 2013.
Sandee Bryan Maflon, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and ;i/fixcd the seal o/the said court on this October 2. 201 3.
ItilWlfl. I ■'-'
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.