Steve McCraw v. Ricardo Valdez Gomez, Jr.
Steve McCraw v. Ricardo Valdez Gomez, Jr.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-13-00573-CV Style: Steve McCraw v Ricardo Valdez Gomez, Jr. Date motion filed*: August 29, 2013 Type of motion: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief Is appeal accelerated? No If motion to extend time: Original due date: August 29, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: August 29, 2013 Date Requested: 15 days after filing of a supplemental clerk’s record Ordered that motion is: Granted in part If document is to be filed, document due: Monday, September 30, 2013 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ The motion is granted is part. Appellant’s brief is due no later than Monday, September 30, 2013.
Judge's signature: _____________________________________________ Panel consists of /s/ Justice Jim Sharp Date: September 9, 2013
November 7, 2008 Revision
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.