Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

Schmidt Land Services, Inc. v. Unifirst Corporation and Unifirst Holdings Inc. Successor in Merger to Unifirst Holdings LP D/B/A Unifirst

Schmidt Land Services, Inc. v. Unifirst Corporation and Unifirst Holdings Inc. Successor in Merger to Unifirst Holdings LP D/B/A Unifirst
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 9, 2013

Schmidt Land Services, Inc. v. Unifirst Corporation and Unifirst Holdings Inc. Successor in Merger to Unifirst Holdings LP D/B/A Unifirst

Opinion

Jfourtlj Court of Antonio, September 09,2013 No. 04-13-00206-CV

Schmidt Land Services. Inc..

Appellant

v.

Unifirst Corporation and Unifirst I loldings Inc. Successor in Merger lo Unifirst 1 loldings LP D/B/A Unifirst.

Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 12-09-0834-CVA

ORDER The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. API'. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on Tuesday.

October 08. 2013. to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Marion, and Justice Alvarez. All parlies will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX.R.APP. P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. API'. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on Monday. September 09, 2013.

Calherine^Stonc. Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal (/the said court on this Monday, September 09. 2013. / /-^) I 11-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.