in Re: William A. Boothe, M.D. and Wendy J. Boothe
in Re: William A. Boothe, M.D. and Wendy J. Boothe
395 S.W.3d 393; 2013 WL 765148; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 1787
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
in Re: William A. Boothe, M.D. and Wendy J. Boothe
Opinion
OPINION
Opinion by
Relators contend the trial judge erred in dissolving a writ of garnishment. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here *394 in. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY rela-tors’ petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion to stay.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.