Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Rebecca Ross
Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Rebecca Ross
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-11—00552-CV Style: Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Rebecca Ross Date motions filedh July 16, 2013; July 17, 2013 Maxine Adams’ Motion to Proceed Without Costs; Emergency Motion for Order of Relief From Memorandum Order Type of motion: Signed on March 26, 2012 Party filing motion: Appellants Ordered that motion is: El Granted If document is to be filed, document due: July 31, 2013 El The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances L71 Denied El Dismissed (eg, want of jurisdiction, moot) El Other: Because Cecil Adams, who is not a licensed attorne , ma not ractice law on behalf of Maxine Adams, he could not file an affidavit on her behalf. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 81.101, 81.102 gWest 2005!; see also Rodriguez v. Press, N0.
01-08-00326-CV, 2009 WL 4856325, * 1 n.2 (Tex. A .—H0uston lst Dist. Dec. 17, 2009, no et. ; Jimison 1; Parker v. Mann, 957 S.W.2d 860, 861 Tex. A
What Panel consists of Date: November 7, 20 8 Re 'sion
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.