Rami Amir and Ron Aliezer v. International Bank of Commerce
Rami Amir and Ron Aliezer v. International Bank of Commerce
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON MEMORANDUM ORDER Appellate case name: Rami Amir and Ron Aliezer v. International Bank of Commerce Appellate case number: 01-13-00553-CV Trial court case number: 2012-59086 Trial court: 189th District Court of Harris County
Appellants Rami Amir and Ron Aliezer have filed an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to compel arbitration in the underlying lawsuit. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 171.098(a)(1) (Vernon 2011). The interlocutory appeal is currently pending in this Court.
In this Court, appellants have filed an expedited motion for temporary stay. Pending resolution of this appeal, appellants seek to stay proceedings in the trial court, including the trial court’s determination of appellee International Bank of Commerce’s motion for summary judgment.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 29.3, 29.5. Appellants also seek to stay discovery matters. Appellee has filed a response to the motion.
Appellants contend that permitting the trial court to render judgment on appellee’s motion for summary judgment will deprive appellants of any rights they possess to arbitration and concomitantly render this appeal moot. Appellants also contend that discovery issues are within the scope of matters to be handled in arbitration should this Court determine that they are entitled to arbitration.
Appellants’ arguments are well taken. Accordingly, pending this Court’s disposition of the interlocutory appeal, the motion for temporary relief is granted to the extent of staying the determination of appellee’s motion for summary judgment, trial of the underlying matter, or other dispositive motions. See TEX. R. APP. P. 29.3. All matters relating to discovery are also stayed, including, but not limited to, any deadline for appellants to answer written discovery propounded by appellee. The trial court retains jurisdiction to make orders dissolving the order denying appellants’ motion to compel arbitration or to effectuate agreements reached by the parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 29.5. (providing that trial court may make further orders pending resolution of interlocutory appeal “including one dissolving the order complained of on appeal”).
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley Acting individually
Date: July 11, 2013
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.