Arthur Vega Individually and D/B/A Dolco Packaging v. Compass Bank
Arthur Vega Individually and D/B/A Dolco Packaging v. Compass Bank
Opinion
Tuesday. July 16.2013
No. 04-H-00383-CV
ARTHUR VEGA INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A DOLCO PACKAGING (APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE), Appellant
v. COMPASS BANK (APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT), Appellee
From the 57th Judicial District Court, Uexar County. Texas Trial Court No. 2012-CI-07719 Honorable Laura Salinas. Judge Presiding
ORDE R Alter reviewing the parlies' addciulums to the Civil Docketing Statement in the above- numbered and styled appeal, this court has determined that this dispute is appropriate lor referral to an Alternative Dispuic Resolution (ADR) procedure. See TEX. Civ. Prac & Ri-:\i. Codh § 154.021 (Vernon 2005). All rurlher communications with this court by the parties regarding ADR shall he directed to the Clerk of the Court for any assistance in the mediation process.
All parlies are ORDERED to respond in writing hy stating: (1) the name, address, and fee schedule of the mediator of their choice; or (2) that they cannot agree on a mediator, in which case the court will appoint one; or (3) any objection to mediation and the reasons for such objection. See id. § 1 54.022 (b).
Provided the parlies submit to mediation, this court will issue an order suspending all appellate deadlines for forty-five (45) days in order that the parlies nun' concentrate on the scheduling and completion of the mediation process.
Is il so ORDERED on Tuesday. July I 6. 2013.
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
:?/lN^W|l^EsJvivilfcRI-X)l;. 1 have hereunto set my hand and ^fexed the seal of the said eoiirt ' Lf-T—
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.