AmeriPlan Corporation, Daniel Bloom and Dennis Bloom v. McKenzie, Lawrence
AmeriPlan Corporation, Daniel Bloom and Dennis Bloom v. McKenzie, Lawrence
Opinion
DISMISS; Opinion issued January 23, 2013.
Qqurt at Appeals Zfiifth Eistrirt at Emma at Dallas No. 05-12-00920-CV AMERIPLAN CORPORATION, DANIEL BLOOM AND DENNIS BLOOM, Appellants V LAWRENCE MCKENZIE, Appellee On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC—l 1-06272 OPINION Before Justices Lang—Miers, Myers and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis Before the Court is appellants’ January 16, 2013 unopposed motion to dismiss appeal. In the motion, appellants state the parties have resolved the issue on appeal and request dismissal of the appeal with costs assessed against the party incurring same. We grant appellants’ motion and dismiss this appeal.
AVID LEWIS JUSTICE 120920F.P05
(Kmart uf Appeala lflifth flintritt uf @Bxaa at 59311325 JUDGMENT AmeriPlan Corporation, Daniel Bloom and On Appeal from the l9lst Judicial District Dennis Bloom, Appellants Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC—l 106272.
No. 05~12-00920~CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis.
Justices Lang—Miers and Myers Lawrence McKenzie, Appellee participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.
Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, it is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.
Judgment entered this 23rd day of January, 2013. ‘ ' DAVID LE IS JUSTICE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.