Writ of Mandamus Denied, Opinion issued January 3, 2013.

In The øatrt uf Apii.a1i 3Fifth Jitrict uf ixai at tttas No. 05-12-01700-CV

IN RE ZOE MICHELLE JACKMAN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DFO7- 10155-S

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O’Neill, Francis, and Murphy Opinion by Justice O’Neill Relator contends the trial judge erred in awarding certain fees to an amicus attorney. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has an adequate remedy on appeal. See Tux. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); In re Prudential Ins, Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

JUSTICE l21700F.P05