in Re: Lakeith Amir Sharif
in Re: Lakeith Amir Sharif
Opinion
Vrit of Mandamus l)enied, Opinion issued January 3, 2013
In ‘fhe Qnizrt uf 4’VIah FiftI! Jiitrirt iii itxai tt Ji11ti . 05-12-01640-CV
IN RE LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1)C-09-7655
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices ONeill. Francis. and Murphy Opinion by Justice ONeill Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not properly serving him, not ruling on his motions, and not appointing a competent attorney for him. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested .See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a): Sinio,i c. Leario. 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. e.v rel. Hill i. Court ofApjealsfr the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924. 927 (Tex. Crirn. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
‘ MICHAELJ 0 NEILL JUSTICE 121640F.P05
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.