Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

C.S. Marble & Granite, Inc. Clayton M. Schwarz, Individually and Suzanne L. Schwarz, Individually v. CIT Small Business Lending Corporation

C.S. Marble & Granite, Inc. Clayton M. Schwarz, Individually and Suzanne L. Schwarz, Individually v. CIT Small Business Lending Corporation
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 2, 2013

C.S. Marble & Granite, Inc. Clayton M. Schwarz, Individually and Suzanne L. Schwarz, Individually v. CIT Small Business Lending Corporation

Opinion

Opinion issued April 2, 2013

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00513-CV

C.S. MARBLE & GRANITE, INC. CLAYTON M. SCHWARZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AND SUZANNE L. SCHWARZ, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants V. CIT SMALL BUSINESS LENDING CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-56171

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, C.S. Marble & Granite, Inc., Clayton M. Schwarz, and Suzanne L. Schwarz, have neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (West Supp. 2012), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2012) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due May 30, 2012. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not respond.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3 (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal). Further, appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Appellants did not respond.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.