Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

James Brandon Clinton v. Raphiza Louziero

James Brandon Clinton v. Raphiza Louziero
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 14, 2013

James Brandon Clinton v. Raphiza Louziero

Opinion

Opinion issued February 14, 2013

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

NO. 01-12-00737-CV

JAMES BRANDON CLINTON, Appellant V. RAPHIZA LOUZIERO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-55986

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, James Brandon Clinton, has neither paid the required filing fee for this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2012), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2012) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due on August 27, 2012. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.