Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2013

Patricia Jahns v. Stuart Blackstock

Patricia Jahns v. Stuart Blackstock
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 31, 2013

Patricia Jahns v. Stuart Blackstock

Opinion

Opinion issued January 31, 2013

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00613-CV ——————————— PATRICIA JAHNS, Appellant V. STUART BLACKSTOCK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 43443

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Patricia Jahns, has neither paid the required filing fee for this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (West Supp. 2012), §.51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2012) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due on July 16, 2012.

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.