Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2014

in the Interest of K.D.M. and K.D.M.

in the Interest of K.D.M. and K.D.M.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 25, 2014

in the Interest of K.D.M. and K.D.M.

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00170-CV ____________________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.D.M. AND K.D.M. _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. C-208,666-B ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 2, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. On June 10, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. Appellant did not respond to the Court’s notices.

Appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and has not shown that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.

There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal, and there being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the clerk’s record, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice

Submitted on September 24, 2014 Opinion Delivered September 25, 2014 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.