in Re Mark E. Lee
in Re Mark E. Lee
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00592-CV
In re Mark E. Lee
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N
Relator Mark E. Lee filed a petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition directed to his former trial counsel.1 However, we may issue such writs only against a district judge or county judge sitting in our district, or to enforce our jurisdiction, none of which are implicated here. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 6; Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(b); see also In re Conway, No. 01-14-00612-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 10333, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
Sept. 16, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing for want of jurisdiction mandamus petition seeking to compel relator’s former trial counsel to provide case file). The petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________ Jeff Rose, Justice Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin Filed: September 25, 2014 Lee also filed a motion for leave to file this petition, which we dismiss as moot.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.