Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2014

Samotta Richardson v. Markos S. Wodajo

Samotta Richardson v. Markos S. Wodajo
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 7, 2014

Samotta Richardson v. Markos S. Wodajo

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00325-CV

SAMOTTA RICHARDSON APPELLANT V. MARKOS S. WODAJO APPELLEE

------------ FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 067-259343-12 ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ On September 19, 2014, we denied appellant’s “Response To Late Brief Notice,” which we liberally construed as a motion for extension of time based on repeated requests from appellant that this court has already denied. We stated that if appellant’s brief is not filed in this court by Monday, September 29, 2014, this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 23, 2014

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.