Tambria Lee v. Daniel Leon Peterson and Morgan Peterson, Jr.
Tambria Lee v. Daniel Leon Peterson and Morgan Peterson, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 18, 2014
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00646-CV ——————————— TAMBRIA LEE, Appellant V. DANIEL LEON PETERSON AND MORGAN PETERSON, JR., Appellees
On Appeal from the 239th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 53927
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Tambria Lee, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(b).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.