Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2014

Rosalind Isaac v. Midfirst Bank

Rosalind Isaac v. Midfirst Bank
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 18, 2014

Rosalind Isaac v. Midfirst Bank

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00190-CV

Rosalind Isaac, Appellant v. Midfirst Bank, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 14-0056-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Rosalind Isaac filed a pro se brief on October 14, 2014. On November 5, 2014, we ordered Isaac to file an amended brief complying with the formal and substantive rules of appellate procedure on or before December 4, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1; Bolling v. Farmers Branch Indep. Sch. Dist., 315 S.W.3d 893, 896 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.) (“To comply with rule 38.1(f) [of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure], an appellant must articulate the issue we will be asked to decide.”). In our order , we cautioned Isaac that her failure to comply could result in the striking of her brief and the dismissal of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9. To date, Isaac has not complied with or otherwise responded to this Court’s order. Accordingly, we strike Isaac’s brief and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); Bolling, 315 S.W.3d at 897 (dismissing pro se appeal for failure to comply with briefing requirements after opportunity to cure deficiencies). __________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field Dismissed Filed: December 18, 2014

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.